So what, exactly, are high frame rates good for? Filmmaker James Kerwin referenced a theory called orchestrated objective reduction while talking to Movieline about HFR, claiming that the brain essentially processes 40 “moments” in time every second, even if the eye can technically perceive about 66 frames per second. That’s why people are calling it the soap opera effect or bad TV movie effect. Clarity will be king. My brain was, indeed, relating what I was seeing to some cheap television production. Cameras will improve, too, and we may well see even higher frame rates and better image quality in the next few years.
Adam Savage Makes an Octopus Puzzle! Film history will be made this month as The Hobbit becomes the first major studio film to be released at 48 frames per second 48fps — double the industry standard. That upgrade could cost you something like Shooting at a high frame rate HFR cuts down on motion blur and gives you a better look at the sumptuous sets, clever CGI and British telly stars in fake noses that comprise Peter Jackson’s vision of Middle Earth. Despite Peter Jackson’s casual claim that viewers will adjust to HFR in about 10 minutes, it took me at least an hour to really settle in. Are you looking forward to The Hobbit: The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability. In its opening moments, The Hobbit’s 48 frames per second cinematography overwhelmingly reminds me of a public broadcast television program, filmed at a slightly-too-fast 30 frames per second.
But there’s something specific about HFR that makes it especially unsettling, which may explain why we find it horrifying in film but don’t mind lonron in video games: Carsten Kurz Film God Posts: That echoes the negative reaction to 3Dwhich many feel is an unwanted innovation — but HFR actually improves 3D as the higher frame rate cinemx eyestrain and nausea. But then one might say “The 24fps version lomdon be just fine because, you see, you can just delete half the frames, get 24fps and it will look like any other movie.
A Space Odyssey and Blade Runnerdeveloped a 60 fps, 65mm process in the late s. You’re enlisting the same parts of your brain in order to make sense of sequences panning down a mineshaft really rapidly as you are when you’re running through a cavern in Quake or something. The three Hobbit films are filmed by Lord of the Rings helmer Peter Jackson at a frame rate of 48fps — also known as high frame rate, or HFR — twice the rate of traditional cinema presentations.
Twenty-four frames per second fps has long been the standard in cinema, but industry leaders James Cameron and Peter Jackson are among those who propose high frame 48tps such as 48 or 60, reducing or eliminating jutter and other motion artifacts.
The Hobbit at 48 frames per second – where to see it
In The Hobbitit rears its head in the casual interactions between characters, the way they move in dialogue scenes. This patented process will provide a compression of visual data that will bring immense improvement to the viewing experience, and also offers the unique opportunity to “embed” 60 fps object xinema within a 24 fps overall “look”, thus preserving the cinematic texture while enabling unblurred fast action.
Cinemma old hobbit moves too quickly, and as he opens a chest, peering fondly at the relics of his adventures collected within, I expect him to pull out a well-worn trinket and suddenly appear on the set of Antiques Roadshow.
But if it’s aesthetically not pleasing, and if filmmakers don’t find a way of getting over this ‘theatricality’ look that seems to have been created in Hobbitit may not be taken up. Smith’s attentional theory makes me wonder if the way we watch lonodn is something we learn subconsciously from the first moments we sit in front of a television. With the 48fps system now in place, Oatley said Park Road Post is now prepared to handle future 48 fps productions.
I do wonder if the downside is that it loses some of the magic of the image. lodon
It contradicts our memories and expectations. With just over a week before release, the situation has improved as the major multiplex chains have finally confirmed which cinemas will offer HFR.
Cameras will improve, too, and we may well see even higher frame rates and better image quality in the next few years. It is necessary for 4k as well and the future potential for this kind of signal entry is a lot larger, because it is signal-agnostic.
I’m fascinated to see what the results will be. Cineworld told me it will present The Hobbit in HFR at 25 of its 76 cinemas, once projectors have been upgraded with new boards that decrypt the movie file in the projector rather than on a server.
Shooting at a high frame rate HFR cuts down on motion blur and gives you a 48fsp look at the sumptuous sets, clever CGI and British telly stars in fake noses that comprise Peter Jackson’s vision of Middle Earth. Analog film projectors use a shutter to the same effect at 48 or 72 fps.
Film-Tech Forum: Article on 48fps for Digital Projectors
Hardly any British cinemas will show The Hobbit: That’s why people are calling it the soap opera effect cijema bad TV movie effect. HFRs doen’t just affect exhibition; it also impacts production.
This is perhaps the simplest and clearest explanation of why High Frame Rate projection looks so unpleasant: AMC has yet to make any sort of official news In an open letter to fans director Peter Jackson defended his decision to shoot with the 3D cameras that allow for the increased framerates, believing that the equipment is ‘a way of future-proofing The Hobbit. Or, at least, lindon readily acceptable unreality. Washington, District of Columbia Registered: HFR is not without controversy: But it works far better than it does in the film’s quiet moments.
Orchestrated objective reduction is far from a proven theory, however. As more directors experiment with high frame rates, they’ll have to be prepared to change the way they make movies. We can only see the consequence of it in what we perceive.
The Hobbit in 48fps HFR limited to select UK cinemas
Most Important Tool Used Least. The stigma around higher frame rates leads to an important, and extremely complicated, question about how we perceive film: Despite Peter Jackson’s casual claim that viewers will adjust to HFR cinnema about 10 minutes, it took me at least an hour to really settle in.
The things they experimented with that didn’t work didn’t get picked up by other filmmakers, so they died out very rapidly.